Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Paleontology   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Paleontology; May 2007; v. 81; no. 3; p. 588-590; DOI: 10.1666/05127.1
© 2007 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MILLER, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by TETLIE, O. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

PALEONTOLOGICAL NOTES

THE PRESUMED SYNZIPHOSURAN BUNODELLA HORRIDA MATTHEW, 1889 (SILURIAN; CUNNINGHAM CREEK FORMATION, NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA) IS A EURYPTERID

RANDALL F. MILLER1 and O. ERIK TETLIE2

1 Steinhammer Palaeontology Laboratory, New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, New Brunswick E2K 1E5, Canada, <Randall.Miller@nbm-mnb.ca>,
2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8109, <erik.tetlie@yale.edu>

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
THE ENIGMATIC Silurian fossil Bunodella horrida Matthew, 1889 was originally described as a crustacean (Matthew, 1889). B. horrida was later included with the pseudoniscid synziphosurines by Størmer (1955) in the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Bunodella Matthew, 1889 was subsequently dismissed as a merostome in later treatments (Eldredge, 1974; Anderson and Selden, 1997). However, the type and only known specimen (Fig. 1), housed in the New Brunswick Museum (NBMG), has not been re-studied since Matthew's initial description. Reexamination of this fossil has led us to interpret it as the partial coxa of a pterygotid eurypterid swimming leg. The coxa is likely to belong to Acutiramus Ruedemann, 1935 rather than any other pterygotid, but it cannot be further separated from other species in the genus and is left as Acutiramus sp. A more precise assignment must await more diagnostic material (e.g., chelicerae). The genus Bunodella Matthew, 1889 is therefore deemed invalid and its usage discontinued. Bunodella Pfeffer, 1889 was also established as a genus of a modern hexacoralline anemone based on a single species, B. georgiana Pfeffer, 1889, but has since been reassigned to the genus Parantheopsis McMurrich, 1904 by Carlgren (1949) along with several other species of anenome.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (79K):



 
FIGURE 1—Holotype . . . [Full Text of this Article]

 






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Paleontological Society