Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Paleontology   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Paleontology; September 2008; v. 82; no. 5; p. 974-983; DOI: 10.1666/07-046.1
© 2008 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toro, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maletz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ARTICLE

The Proximal Development in Cymatograptus (Graptoloidea) from Argentina and Its Relevance for the Early Evolution of the Dichograptacea

Blanca A. Toro1 and Jörg Maletz2

1 CONICET. Departamento de Geología y Paleontología, IANIGLA, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, C.C. 131, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina, <btorogr{at}lab.cricyt.edu.ar>
2 Department of Geology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 772 Natural Science Complex, Buffalo, N.Y. 14260-3050, USA, <jorgm{at}buffalo.edu>

Cymatograptus bidextro sp. nov. from the Floian "Baltograptus deflexus" Biozone of northwest Argentina represents the oldest expansograptid with an artus type proximal development and a prosicular origin of the first theca. The species bears a variably dextral or sinistral proximal development, previously known exclusively from Tremadocian members of the Anisograptidae, but not from the Dichograptidae. The proximal development types of the Dichograptacea are shown to consist of several independently changing characters and cannot be used as phylogenetically useful descriptors. Proximal developments are more variable than expected and several independent origins of an artus type proximal development can be recognized in the Lower to Middle Ordovician.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society