Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Paleontology   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Paleontology; January 2005; v. 79; no. 1; p. 152-174; DOI: 10.1666/0022-3360(2005)079<0152:TPAOOC>2.0.CO;2
© 2005 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BROWER, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

THE PALEOBIOLOGY AND ONTOGENY OF CINCINNATICRINUS VARIBRACHIALUS WARN AND STRIMPLE, 1977 FROM THE MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN (SHERMANIAN) WALCOTT-RUST QUARRY OF NEW YORK

JAMES C. BROWER1

1 Heroy Geology Laboratory, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244-1070

The lichenocrinid holdfast of Cincinnaticrinus varibrachialus Warn and Strimple, 1977 was attached to a variety of hard objects, i.e., crinoid stems, twig-shaped and flat bryozoans, brachiopods, bivalves, cephalopod shells, trilobites, and phosphate nodules, throughout life. This represents an adaptation to a soft substrate and most individuals are found in carbonate or carbonate-clay muds that were deposited in moderately deep and quiet water. Evidence from living and fossil crinoids suggests that the cincinnaticrinid column either required little nourishment from the crown or it may even have been metabolically self sustaining. The food-gathering system mainly needs to supply the energy needs of the crown with little or no contribution to the stem. Very likely, this applies to many crinoids. Consequently, it is appropriate to analyze the food gathering system with respect to the crown volume as a size parameter.

The aboral cup grows slowly compared to the arms. Brachs and ramulars show little shape change. Length of the column is augmented by formation of new columnals and size increase of old ones at all growth stages. Virtually all new columnals form by intercalation between older plates rather than being initiated immediately below the aboral cup. Most size-related variables in the arms are characterized by positive allometry relative to crown volume. New arm branches develop continuously. Likewise, new brachs and ramulars appear at the distal tips of all arms. This plate supply rate along with deposition of calcite on old arm plates produces an exponentially increasing growth rate for total length of the arms. Food-gathering capacity equals the number of food-catching tubefeet times the average food groove width. Due to the positive allometry of the size of the arms, the ratio of food-gathering capacity:crown volume is constant regardless of size so the capacity of the food-gathering system keeps pace with the tissue that must be fed. However, the average food groove width only changes slightly so that youngsters and adults ate food particles of about the same size.

Variation in number of brachs in the arms of C. varibrachialus is comparable to that of many Ordovician cladids. Specimens of C. varibrachialus from the Kope Formation of the Cincinnati, Ohio, area possess more numerous primibrachs than animals from the Walcott-Rust Quarry, although the two populations overlap greatly. Intercalated brachs are known in the midcontinent crinoids but not in the New York specimens. The basic arm structure, cup and crown shapes, ornamentation, and the morphology of the columnals and the holdfast of all crinoids are identical and the midcontinent and New York suites of crinoids are considered conspecific.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
J. C. Brower
Systematics and Paleoecology of Haptocrinus Buttsi, a New Species of Disparid Crinoid from the Upper Ordovician Hatter Limestone of Central Pennsylvania
Journal of Paleontology, May 1, 2008; 82(3): 576 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
J. C. BROWER
SOME DISPARID CRINOIDS FROM THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN (SHERMANIAN) WALCOTT-RUST QUARRY OF NEW YORK
Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2008; 82(1): 57 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
J. C. BROWER
THE APPLICATION OF FILTRATION THEORY TO FOOD GATHERING IN ORDOVICIAN CRINOIDS
Journal of Paleontology, November 1, 2007; 81(6): 1284 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
J. C. BROWER
ONTOGENY OF THE FOOD-GATHERING SYSTEM IN ORDOVICIAN CRINOIDS
Journal of Paleontology, May 1, 2006; 80(3): 430 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society