Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of Paleontology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BODENBENDER, B. E. Articles by HIEMSTRA, E. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A RECONNAISSANCE OF SKELETAL CRYSTALLOGRAPHY IN RHOMBIFERANS, DIPLOPORANS, AND PARACRINOIDS

¹ Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49422-9000, <bodenbender{at}hope.edu>
² ChevronTexaco, 9525 Camino Media, Bakersfield, California 93311, <EHiemstra{at}chevrontexaco.com>

We characterized the skeletal crystallography of representatives of nine rhombiferan, three diploporan, and three paracrinoid species. Crystallographic data from these groups are similar to data from previous studies of crinoids, echinoids, and blastoids in that 1) orientations of c axes are consistent within species and within higher taxonomic groups; 2) c axes typically are oriented subparallel to the medial plane of their respective plates; and 3) the inclination of axes within the medial plane varies between taxa. Rhombiferan c axes are oriented normal to plate surfaces whereas diploporan c axes are tangential to plate surfaces. Paracrinoids more closely resemble diploporans in having irregular patterns of thecal plating but their c axes are approximately perpendicular to plate surfaces as in rhombiferans.

In contrast to c axes, a axes in all specimens show little regularity and cannot be distinguished from random orientations.

The rhombiferan Caryocrinites ornatus displays minor differences in the inclinations of c axes depending on the location of skeletal elements on the theca. Plates at the base of the theca have slightly aborally inclined axes, whereas distal plates have axes inclined slightly adorally. This pattern matches orientations in some early crinoids, suggesting similarities between rhombiferans and crinoids in development or skeletal construction.

Skeletal crystallography in various echinoderms can be compared in light of hypotheses of homology proposed in the Extraxial-Axial Theory (EAT). Skeletal elements homologized under the EAT do not correspond to any particular crystallographic axis orientation, suggesting that the homologies proposed in the EAT encompass significant underlying skeletal variation.