Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Paleontology   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Paleontology; September 2004; v. 78; no. 5; p. 961-972; DOI: 10.1666/0022-3360(2004)078<0961:EPAOBI>2.0.CO;2
© 2004 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WAUGH, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

EPIBIONT PRESERVATIONAL AND OBSERVATIONAL BIAS IN FOSSIL MARINE DECAPODS

DAVID A. WAUGH1, RODNEY M. FELDMANN1, ROBERT S. CRAWFORD1, STEN LENNART JAKOBSEN2 and KYLE B. THOMAS1

1 Kent State University, Department of Geology, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA, <dwaugh{at}kent.edu>
2 Geological Museum, University of Copenhagen Øster Voldgade 5–7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark, <slj{at}savik.geomus.ku.dk>

Epibionts on both living and fossil decapod crustaceans may serve as valuable proxies for paleoecological factors such as behavior and environment. Prevalence of epibionts, as observed primarily on the carapaces of fossil brachyurous decapod crustaceans, appears to be less than observed on living crabs, based upon observations in the literature, and from the study of a limited preserved biological and fossil collection. Among these factors, the three most important are that many extant epibionts do not possess skeletal structures and, therefore, are unlikely to be preserved; the epicuticle upon which epibionts attach to living brachyurans is lightly calcified and tends to be lost readily as a result of taphonomic processes; and the most common mode of preservation of fossil brachyurans is in concretions which tend to break open and leave a layer of cuticle on the counterpart, thus obscuring the potential surface of attachment of epibionts. Other factors such as the life habits of the crab, whether burrowing, burying, or remaining above the substrate; lifestyle, whether benthic or pelagic; and duration of the intermolt phase of the organism also play important roles in potential prevalence of epibionts. Careful preparation of part and counterpart remains of brachyurans as well as reference to the occurrence of epibionts in systematic studies will enhance knowledge of the host and epibiont.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
EPIBIONTS ON DROMIOPSIS RUGOSA (DECAPODA: BRACHYURA) FROM THE LATE MIDDLE DANIAN LIMESTONES AT FAKSE QUARRY, DENMARK: NOVEL PREPARATION TECHNIQUES YIELD AMAZING RESULTS
Journal of Paleontology, September 1, 2004; 78(5): 953 - 960.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Paleontological Society