Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of Paleontology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by SUNDBERG, F. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF EARLY–MIDDLE CAMBRIAN KOCHASPID TRILOBITES (PTYCHOPARIIDA)

¹ Show Low High School, 500 W. Old Linden Road, Show Low, Arizona, <freds{at}show-low.k12.az.us>

Cambrian ptychopariids have defied most attempts at higher classification. Even at the generic level, there is no consensus as to what constitutes identification criteria in these morphologically conservative trilobites. The problem is more acute when there is a lack of knowledge about the different sclerites of species, the presence of species with morphologies intermediate between two genera, the naming of genera where incompletely known or poor quality specimens were used for type species, and the use of character checklists to generate diagnoses for higher taxa. This study on the kochaspid trilobites (Lower to Middle Cambrian) uses several available representatives of each genus to alleviate or assess some of these problems. Successive reweighting of characters is used for the assessment of 70 characters among 66 taxa as to their importance in forming clades. Results of this study include five important points about ptychopariid classification: 1) knowledge about noncranidial sclerites is important for the proper placement of taxa that have generalized morphologies; 2) in contrast, taxa that have more derived cranidial morphology can be accurately placed within a clade; 3) intermediate morphologies illustrate a close link between genera, but these forms can present nomenclatural problems in their placement; 4) although genera defined by type species based on incompletely described or poorly preserved specimens can create nomenclatural nightmares, other species assigned to these genera are not dependent on their previous taxonomic assignment for their placement in the cladogram; and 5) checklists of morphological characters cannot be used to recognize ptychopariid groups, since the level of homoplasy is too high and there are too many reversals of character states within a clade. Instead, a list of character states that typify a taxonomic group is more useful and will lead to a more stable classification.

This cladistic analysis of kochaspid trilobites indicates that 64 of the 70 characters were useful in the formation of clades. Fifty-six cranidial, librigenal, thoracic, and pygidial characters were useful in typifying larger and smaller clades. The analysis also indicates that Eokochaspis, Nyella, and Onchocephalus are polyphyletic. Reassignments based on the cladistic analysis include Schistometopus collaris to Caborcella, and Syspacephalus obscurus to Mexicella.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				THE TOPAZAN STAGE, A NEW LAURENTIAN STAGE (LINCOLNIAN SERIES--"MIDDLE" CAMBRIAN) Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2005; 79(1): 63 - 71.