|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Journal of Paleontology | ![]() |
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Biological Sciences, LSCB 124, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688, <baxsmith{at}jaguar1.usouthal.edu>
2 Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontology und GeologieFunktioneinheit PaläontologyRichard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 Münchin
Cheirolepidiaceous conifer pollen cones (Classostrobus arkansensis new species) from the Lower Cretaceous (Aptian/Albian) Holly Creek Formation of Arkansas, some still attached to Pseudofrenelopsis parceramosa Fontaine, shoots, bear helically arranged, semipeltate to dorsiventral microsporophylls with abaxially situated pollen masses. The in situ Classopollis Pflug, 1953 pollen and orbicule outer sculpturing consists of short spinules. The abaxial epidermis of the microsporophyll head consists of a stomatiferous central region of isodiametric cells bearing hollow papillae with rounded apices and a nonstomatiferous marginal area of elongate, nonpapillate cells. The head abaxial cuticles are thin relative to those of the shoot internodes. A cutinized hypodermis is lacking. Previously described pollen cones of Classostrobus comptonensis (Alvin et al., 1994) from the English Wealden (Barremian) are also associated with P. parceramosa shoots; however, they differ substantially from the Arkansas cones in possessing peltate microsporophylls with the abaxial surfaces bearing conical papillae, a cutinized hypodermis, and cuticles as thick as those of the shoot internodes. Therefore, at least two morphologically distinct pollen cones were produced on ultimate shoots conforming to P. parceramosa as presently circumscribed. Most cheirolepidiaceous conifers possess extremely thick cuticles on the abaxial surface of the microsporophyll head, which may suggest an unusual pollination biology entailing the production of fewer, relatively long-lived pollen cones. However, the thin cuticles and relatively abundant material of Classostrobus arkansensis n. sp. are more consistent with the typical coniferous pollination system, which includes production of numerous, ephemeral cones. Apparently, the Cheirolepidiaceae possessed a diversity of reproductive strategies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Ren, C. C. Labandeira, J. A. Santiago-Blay, A. Rasnitsyn, C. Shih, A. Bashkuev, M. A. V. Logan, C. L. Hotton, and D. Dilcher A Probable Pollination Mode Before Angiosperms: Eurasian, Long-Proboscid Scorpionflies Science, November 6, 2009; 326(5954): 840 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. McElwain, M. E. Popa, S. P. Hesselbo, M. Haworth, and F. Surlyk Macroecological responses of terrestrial vegetation to climatic and atmospheric change across the Triassic/Jurassic boundary in East Greenland Paleobiology, December 1, 2007; 33(4): 547 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Greb, W. A. DiMichele, and R. A. Gastaldo Evolution and importance of wetlands in earth history Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 399(0): 1 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |