|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Journal of Paleontology | ![]() |
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Dept. of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794
2 Dept. of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98195
3 Dept. of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
A molecular survey of animal phylogeny (Wray et al., 1996) recovered the presumed correct temporal order of the phylogenetic splits Protostomata-Deuterostomata, Echinodermata-Chordata, and Agnatha-Gnathostomata in studies of six of seven gene sequences. This result raised the question of how this order could be recovered if all of the phyla had appeared in a Cambrian "explosion" of less than 10 m.y., given the expected erratic nature of the molecular "clock." We simulated trees, and molecular sequence evolution along the trees, under different evolutionary radiation scenarios, with different periods of radiation, relative to times of subsequent evolution. Simulations and phylogenetic analyses of sequences derived from a simulated "Cambrian explosion" of 1035 million years did not allow the successful recovery of the correct tree, using neighbor-joining, maximum likelihood, or parsimony methods. Success in recovering phylogenies under a Cambrian divergence scenario (520 million years ago) did not exceed 80 percent without an extended divergence time interval of at least 100 m.y. An increased substitution rate during the initial radiation improved the ability to recover correct phylogenies, especially when the rate was 810 times the rate following the radiation. Our results militate against the likelihood of an Early Cambrian or slightly longer explosion of the animal phyla, as apparently supported by the fossil record. Some limitations to these conclusions are discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. D. Smith and A. H. Turner Morphology's Role in Phylogeny Reconstruction: Perspectives from Paleontology Syst Biol, February 1, 2005; 54(1): 166 - 173. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |