|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Journal of Paleontology |
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Royal Tyrrell Museum of Paleontology, P.O. Box 7500, Drumheller, Alberta T0J 0Y0, Canada
2 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Museum of Geology and Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, 501 E. Saint Joseph St., Rapid City 57701
3 Royal Tyrrell Museum of Paleontology, P.O. Box 7500, Drumheller, Alberta T0J 0Y0, Canada, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Museum of Geology and Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, 501 E. Saint Joseph St., Rapid City 57701, Julia.Sankey{at}sdsmt.edu
4 Royal Tyrrell Museum of Paleontology, P.O. Box 7500, Drumheller, Alberta T0J 0Y0, Canada
A collection of over 1,700 small theropod teeth from the Judith River Group (Campanian;
79.574 Ma) allows our understanding of the diversity and variation of small theropods in this assemblage to be refined. In addition to the previously recognized taxa, a series of morphologically distinct groups are recognized that may represent distinct taxa in some cases. Teeth with the Paronychodon-like features of a flat surface with longitudinal ridges on one side are resolved into a few discrete morphotypes. Two of these are included in Paronychodon lacustris and two additional morphotypes are hypothesized to represent distinct taxa, here referred to as ?Dromaeosaurus morphotype A and Genus and species indet. A. The teeth of Paronychodon lacustris and ?Dromaeosaurus morphotype A share a distinctive wear pattern that suggests tooth functioning involved contact between the flat surfaces of opposing teeth. Two species of Richardoestesia, R. gilmorei and R. isosceles, are present in the assemblage. Additionally, bird teeth are identified in the assemblage and are described in this review.
Bivariate plots were used to document the variation in the theropod teeth, especially in the features that distinguish between Richardoestesia gilmorei, R. isosceles, Saurornitholestes, and Dromaeosaurus. Considerable overlap is present in all plots, so although the teeth are morphologically distinct, they are not easily distinguished by quantitative means.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. C. D'Amore and R. J. Blumenschine Komodo monitor (Varanus komodoensis) feeding behavior and dental function reflected through tooth marks on bone surfaces, and the application to ziphodont paleobiology Paleobiology, December 1, 2009; 35(4): 525 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. KNOLL and J. I. RUIZ-OMENACA Theropod teeth from the basalmost Cretaceous of Anoual (Morocco) and their palaeobiogeographical significance Geological Magazine, July 1, 2009; 146(4): 602 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Hoganson, J. M. Erickson, and F.D. Holland Jr. Amphibian, reptilian, and avian remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian): Shoreline and estuarine deposits of the Pierre Sea in south-central North Dakota Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 427(0): 239 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |