Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Paleontology   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Paleontology; July 2002; v. 76; no. 4; p. 659-671; DOI: 10.1666/0022-3360(2002)076<0659:EIVECP>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEIGHTON, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by MAPLES, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

EVALUATING INTERNAL VERSUS EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE ECHINOCONCHIDAE, BUXTONIINAE, AND JURESANIINAE (PHYLUM BRACHIOPODA)

LINDSEY R. LEIGHTON2 and CHRISTOPHER G. MAPLES1

1 Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
2 Current address: Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, leighton{at}geology.sdsu.edu

Evolutionary relationships between the Echinoconchidae, Productidae, Buxtoniinae, and Juresaniinae (Phylum Brachiopoda, Order Productida) have been the subject of debate for the better part of a century. The original (Muir-Wood and Williams, 1965) and revised (Brunton et al., 2000) Brachiopoda volumes of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology use markedly different classifications and emphasize different characters. The 1965 Treatise classification for these taxa primarily was based on internal features, especially the cardinal process; the revised Treatise (2000) relied on external ornament and shell shape. Multiple phylogenetic analyses (global parsimony, stratocladistics, nearest-neighbor) of 14 genera, representing all of the relevant subfamilies and outgroups, are in strong agreement that 1) the subfamily Buxtoniinae belongs in the family Echinoconchidae, not to the Productidae; 2) the subfamily Juresaniinae is more closely related to the Echinoconchinae than to the Buxtoniinae; and 3) that internal characters, such as a shafted cardinal process and anterio-medial position of the brachial valve adductor field, provide the best phylogenetic signal, and are synapomorphic for the Echinoconchidae. Jackknifing and Bremer Support corroborate these results.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
K. D. Angielczyk and D. L. Fox
Exploring new uses for measures of fit of phylogenetic hypotheses to the fossil record
Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 147 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society