Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of Paleontology

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by AUSICH, W. I. Articles by KAMMER, T. W. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

THE STUDY OF CRINOIDS DURING THE 20TH CENTURY AND THE CHALLENGES OF THE 21ST CENTURY

¹ Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, ausich.1{at}osu.edu
² Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6300, tkammer{at}wvu.edu

Development of a phylogenetic classification has been a primary pursuit of crinoid paleontologists during the 20th century. Wachsmuth and Springer and Bather vigorously debated crinoid classification during the waning years of the 19th century, and although tremendous progress has been made a comprehensive phylogenetic classification is still the primary objective for crinoid research during the early 21st century. Twentieth century crinoid studies are divisible into four periods. The direct influence of Frank Springer and Francis Bather continued until approximately 1925. Descriptive studies dominated the period of 1926–1943 and culminated in a comprehensive classification of Paleozoic crinoids that was a combination of the ideas of Wachsmuth and Springer and Bather. The end of the third period, 1944–1978, was marked by publication of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. The Treatise compilation brought together classification ideas for the entire class into a truly comprehensive classification, although problems remained with the phylogenetic underpinnings of the Treatise classification. During the third period, pioneering work on crinoid paleobiology laid the foundation for significant paleobiology advances for the fourth, 1979–1999, period. This last period also witnessed significant advances in the taxonomy of crinoid faunas at critical intervals, the taxonomy of crinoids from new geographic areas, and working toward the solution to the origin and early evolution of the Crinoidea.

Continued work on crinoids in the 21st century promises to provide significant advances both for understanding the evolutionary history of crinoids and for understanding the history of epifaunal benthic communities through time. Immediate challenges include completion of a comprehensive phylogenetic classification, which will open the door for evolutionary paleoecologic and paleobiologic studies; utilization of computerized morphometric techniques in the analysis of functional morphology; systematic studies of new faunas in critical intervals; discovery of faunas in new geographic areas to better constrain knowledge of crinoid biogeography; and modern systematic revision of classic North American and European faunas.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Bootstrap Analysis for Comparative Taphonomy Applied to Early Mississippian (Kinderhookian) Crinoids from the Wassonville Cycle of Iowa Palaios, February 1, 2004; 19(1): 17 - 38.

				REDESCRIPTION OF DEVONIAN AND CARBONIFEROUS (PENNSYLVANIAN) BLASTOIDS FROM WESTERN YUNNAN, CHINA Journal of Paleontology, November 1, 2003; 77(6): 1129 - 1132.

				D. Jablonski Survival without recovery after mass extinctions PNAS, June 11, 2002; 99(12): 8139 - 8144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]