Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of Paleontology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by FORTEY, R. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

TRILOBITE SYSTEMATICS: THE LAST 75 YEARS

¹ Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom

The progress achieved in trilobite systematics over the last 75 years is briefly reviewed. Different approaches to phylogenetics have influenced the way trilobites have been classified. Classical evolutionary taxonomy, the stratigraphical approach, and cladistics have all contributed in different ways to the current classification, which has evolved piecemeal, and is still unsatisfactory is some ways. Nonetheless, progress towards a phylogenetic classification has been made, especially as the result of information from ontogenies provided by well-preserved silificified material. Trilobites are a well-defined clade within a larger arachnomorph group. Agnostida have been excluded from Trilobita, but are perhaps best considered as specialised trilobites, at least until limbs of eodiscids are described. The outstanding problems in classification of each trilobite order are reviewed. Most are concerned with the recognition of the appropriate Cambrian sister taxa, and the discovery of the relevant ontogenies. It is very likely that post-Cambrian clades "root" deeply into the Cambrian. The coherence, or otherwise, of Proetida, Asaphida, Corynexochida and the lichid/odontopleurid groups will be resolved by such studies. The problems of paraphyly in Ptychopariida and Redlichiina may prove more obdurate. The temporal brevity of certain Cambrian family ranges may be partly a taxonomic artefact. The possibility of a late Cambrian gap in the record on some clades should be considered.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. WEBSTER ONTOGENY AND EVOLUTION OF THE EARLY CAMBRIAN TRILOBITE GENUS NEPHROLENELLUS (OLENELLOIDEA) Journal of Paleontology, November 1, 2007; 81(6): 1168 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Webster A Cambrian Peak in Morphological Variation Within Trilobite Species Science, July 27, 2007; 317(5837): 499 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF EARLY-MIDDLE CAMBRIAN KOCHASPID TRILOBITES (PTYCHOPARIIDA) Journal of Paleontology, September 1, 2004; 78(5): 920 - 940.

				D. Jablonski Survival without recovery after mass extinctions PNAS, June 11, 2002; 99(12): 8139 - 8144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]