Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of Paleontology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BODENBENDER, B. E. Articles by FISHER, D. C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

STRATOCLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF BLASTOID PHYLOGENY

¹ Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49422-9000,bodenbender{at}hope.edu
² Museum of Paleontology and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1079, dcfisher{at}umich.edu

Stratocladistics combines morphological and stratigraphic data in a parsimony-based analysis of evolutionary relationships. We use stratocladistics here to provide an overview of the phylogeny of the extinct echinoderm class Blastoidea. Both cladistic and stratocladistic methods evaluate alternative phylogenies by comparing the number of ad hoc hypotheses needed to reconcile each alternative to observed data. Minimization of ad hoc hypotheses selects the phylogeny best supported by data and enables phylogenetic analyses to incorporate data from different sources. Cladistics treats ad hoc hypotheses of homoplasy, whereas stratocladistics additionally considers ad hoc hypotheses of differential preservation probability of lineages in the stratigraphic record.

The blastoid phylogeny derived using stratocladistics is more resolved than hypotheses selected by cladistics. Although the morphological characters are relatively homoplasious, in this instance the stratigraphic ordering of fossils provides both structure and altered polarity for the stratocladistic hypothesis. The stratocladistic phylogeny supports previous paleontological conclusions of convergence among blastoid lineages and facilitates evaluation of specific hypotheses of character transformation that are integral to recent systematic revisions. Additionally, consideration of temporal data makes some hypotheses of ancestor-descendant relationships more parsimonious than hypotheses of derivation from a common ancestor. The ability to recognize sequential members within single lineages allows more accurate estimation of faunal diversities and more specific reconstruction of evolutionary histories. Chief among possible confounding factors in stratocladistics are instances where preservation potential shows significant geographic variation, although problems of preservation are more tractable than the difficulties homoplasy presents for cladistic analysis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. PARSLEY and C. D. SUMRALL NEW RECUMBENT ECHINODERM GENERA FROM THE BOIS D'ARC FORMATION: LOWER DEVONIAN (LOCHKOVIAN) OF COAL COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Journal of Paleontology, November 1, 2007; 81(6): 1486 - 1493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. HERMSEN and J. R. HENDRICKS THE HIERARCHY OF TIME Palaios, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 403 - 405. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Angielczyk and D. L. Fox Exploring new uses for measures of fit of phylogenetic hypotheses to the fossil record Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 147 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Wilson Integrating ichnofossil and body fossil records to estimate locomotor posture and spatiotemporal distribution of early sauropod dinosaurs: a stratocladistic approach Paleobiology, September 1, 2005; 31(3): 400 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				RESOLUTION, SAMPLING, HIGHER TAXA AND ASSUMPTIONS IN STRATOCLADISTIC ANALYSIS Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2003; 77(1): 189 - 194.

				BLASTOID STRATOCLADISTICS--REPLY TO SUMRALL AND BROCHU Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2003; 77(1): 195 - 198.

				STRATIGRAPHY IN PHYLOGENY RECONSTRUCTION--COMMENT ON SMITH (2000) Journal of Paleontology, July 1, 2002; 76(4): 585 - 586.

				EVALUATING INTERNAL VERSUS EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE ECHINOCONCHIDAE, BUXTONIINAE, AND JURESANIINAE (PHYLUM BRACHIOPODA) Journal of Paleontology, July 1, 2002; 76(4): 659 - 671.

				STRATIGRAPHY IN PHYLOGENY RECONSTRUCTION--REPLY TO SMITH (2000) Journal of Paleontology, July 1, 2002; 76(4): 587 - 589.

				TESTING PHYLOGENETIC HYPOTHESES WITH STRATIGRAPHY AND MORPHOLOGY--A COMMENT ON SMITH (2000) Journal of Paleontology, July 1, 2002; 76(4): 590 - 593.

				Inferring temporal patterns of preservation, origination, and extinction from taxonomic survivorship analysis Paleobiology, December 1, 2001; 27(4): 602 - 630.