Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Paleontology   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Paleontology; January 1999; v. 73; no. 1; p. 117-128
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Early Cambrian trilobite larvae and ontogeny of Ichangia ichangensis Chang, 1957 (Protolenidae) from Henan, China

Xi-Guang Zhang, and Brian R. Pratt

University of Saskatchewan, Department of Geological Sciences, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

The Lower Cambrian Shuigoukou Formation of Xichuan, Henan province, China, yielded phosphatized instars belonging to the protolenid Ichangia ichangensis Chang, 1957, and two undetermined taxa. With relatively simple body plans, the three larval forms resemble each other to some extent, and protaspides of I. ichangensis show general similarities to those of the ellipsocephalid Palaeolenus lantenoisi Mansuy. However, their early ontogenetic processes exhibit subtle yet distinct differences. One group of unassigned protaspides possesses a sagittal glabellar furrow and protomarginal spines with branching extremities. The other unassigned protaspides bear especially long genal and protomarginal spines. The detailed preservation of these larvae reveals delicate structural variations that help provide a framework for evaluating relationships among Early Cambrian trilobites.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
N. C. Hughes, A. Minelli, and G. Fusco
The ontogeny of trilobite segmentation: a comparative approach
Paleobiology, December 1, 2006; 32(4): 602 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
J. R. PATERSON and G. D. EDGECOMBE
THE EARLY CAMBRIAN TRILOBITE FAMILY EMUELLIDAE POCOCK, 1970: SYSTEMATIC POSITION AND REVISION OF AUSTRALIAN SPECIES
Journal of Paleontology, May 1, 2006; 80(3): 496 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
N. C. Hughes
Trilobite Tagmosis and Body Patterning from Morphological and Developmental Perspectives
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 185 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Paleontological Society