Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Paleontology   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Paleontology; November 1961; v. 35; no. 6; p. 1143-1158
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rexroad, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Conodonts from the Kinkaid Formation (Chester) in Illinois

Carl Buckner Rexroad, and Robert C. Burton

The Kinkaid Formation is the uppermost formation in the standard section of the Chester Series for the Mississippian System in North America. The type section of the formation and 2 additional long sections in southern Illinois were chosen for study to show the nature of the youngest Chester conodonts of the area and to determine vertical variations in the fauna. The formation is divisible into 4 lithologic units, here referred to in ascending order as A, B, C, and D. The fauna of the lower 3 lithologic units is typically Chester in aspect but is definitive of the Kinkaid. Genera present are Cavusgnathus, Cladognathodus, Elsonella?, Falcodus?, Gnathodus, Hibbardella, Hindeodella, Lambdagnathus, Ligonodina, Neoprioniodus, Ozarkodina, and Spathognathodus. Some elements in unit C are interpreted as migrants, and these serve to distinguish the unit. Unit B differs from the other 2 units in the sparsity of conodonts found in it. The fauna of unit D is strikingly different from that of the lower 3 units and includes the additional genus Streptognathodus which composes over one-third of the fauna. Cladognathodus, Elsonella?, Gnathodus, and Lambdagnathus were not found in unit D. Other differences between the lower 3 units and unit D are related to differences in species and relative abundances of species. The unit D conodonts have affinities with both the Mississippian and the Pennsylvanian, and its stratigraphic placement must remain an open question. As an adjunct to the stratigraphic studies, the new species Streptognathodus unicornis and Falcodus? alatoides are named.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society